UC知道翻译 英---汉 高分悬赏(答好后加分,分数25--50)要自己翻译,用软件的不算,
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/30 21:11:21
with journalists themselves, not with the marketplace, not with a party. Public journalism advocates sometimes sound as if they mean to empower "the public" relative to journalists. Some elite journal ists have responded hysterically to this notion, as if the public journalists were inviting the mobs into the newsroom, or at least the pollsters and the focus groups (as if they were not already there!). But public journalism does not remove control over the news from journalists themselves.
In this regard, public journalism as a reform movement is conservative. It does not propose new media accountability systems. It does not offer a citizen media review board or a national news council. It does not recommend publicly elected publishe rs or editors. It does not suggest that the press be formally or even informally answerable to a governmental or community body. It does not borrow from Sweden the proposition that government should subsidize news organizations that would e
In this regard, public journalism as a reform movement is conservative. It does not propose new media accountability systems. It does not offer a citizen media review board or a national news council. It does not recommend publicly elected publishe rs or editors. It does not suggest that the press be formally or even informally answerable to a governmental or community body. It does not borrow from Sweden the proposition that government should subsidize news organizations that would e
与新闻工作者，不与市场，不与党。 公开新闻事业有时主张声音，好象他们意味授权" 公众" 相对新闻工作者。 一些精华学报记者反应了歇斯底里这个概念，好象公开新闻工作者邀请暴民入广播电台，或者民意测验者和至少焦点群(好象他们已经不那里!)。 但是公开新闻事业从新闻工作者不取消对新闻的控制。
鉴于此，公开新闻事业作为改革是保守的。 它不提出新的媒介责任系统。 它不提供一个公民媒介评论委员会或一个全国新闻理事会。 它不推荐公开地当选出版者或编辑。 它不建议新闻正式地甚至非正式地是应当负责对一个政府或社团。它从瑞典不借用提议政府应该给将扩大观点变化可利用对广大读者的新闻组织津贴。
大概内容是说:+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!+*-=(&*)%^&%$#@@!
懂不?
哈哈
讲笑!!!