UC知道求翻译！请不好使用机器翻译。谢谢
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/09/20 20:36:20
Intuitively, trade restrictions protecting cultural ‘widgets’ may be able to prevent cultural
degradation. Culture may be highly valued collectively, but if aggregate individual consumer
demand cannot independently sustain the cultural widget in the face of ‘non-cultural’ but
otherwise functionally substitutable products, the widget’s economic survival requires regulatory
protection for its preservation. Conflicts between international trade liberalisation and
domestic policies shielding cultural goods and services may arise in any conceivable trade
measure, from tariffs to tax preferences.
拜托，，请不要使用GOOGLE，翻译！
degradation. Culture may be highly valued collectively, but if aggregate individual consumer
demand cannot independently sustain the cultural widget in the face of ‘non-cultural’ but
otherwise functionally substitutable products, the widget’s economic survival requires regulatory
protection for its preservation. Conflicts between international trade liberalisation and
domestic policies shielding cultural goods and services may arise in any conceivable trade
measure, from tariffs to tax preferences.
拜托，，请不要使用GOOGLE，翻译！
凭直觉，贸易限制措施保护文化'工具'可以防止文化
退化。文化可能是集体的高度重视，但如果总结个别消费者
需求不能独立维持文化的窗口小部件，在面对'非文化' ，但
否则，功能替代产品， Widget的经济生存需要的规管
保护其保存。之间的冲突，国际贸易自由化和
国内政策屏蔽文化产品和文化服务中可能出现的任何可以想象的贸易
措施，从关税，税收优惠。