UC知道再跪求以下文章翻译
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/07/09 00:35:12
Under some windfalls for wipeouts systems, these neighborhood externalities problems could be
partially resolved by transfer payments; for example, the service station owner would be forced to
share the windfall with those who are wiped out. There would be less incentive for making the
change, less at stake if the change occurred. Neighborhood squabble resolving should therefore
consume less time of public decision makers.
Spot Zoning
Under the present system, a city plans and zones some areas for intensive development, others for
unintensive use. It places infrastructure accordingly. The result is that land prices are lower in
the area scheduled for unintensive use. Where does the intensive (e.g., multiple-family) developer
go to reap his windfall? He obtains a rezoning.
Thus, under the present system, plan making invites its own destruction. Under a windfalls for
wipe
partially resolved by transfer payments; for example, the service station owner would be forced to
share the windfall with those who are wiped out. There would be less incentive for making the
change, less at stake if the change occurred. Neighborhood squabble resolving should therefore
consume less time of public decision makers.
Spot Zoning
Under the present system, a city plans and zones some areas for intensive development, others for
unintensive use. It places infrastructure accordingly. The result is that land prices are lower in
the area scheduled for unintensive use. Where does the intensive (e.g., multiple-family) developer
go to reap his windfall? He obtains a rezoning.
Thus, under the present system, plan making invites its own destruction. Under a windfalls for
wipe
根据一些意外的wipeouts系统，这些街道的外部问题是可以
部分解决的转移支付，例如，服务站老板将被迫
意外的份额与这些谁是消灭。会有那么奖励，使
变化，那么，如果在股权发生变化。邻里争吵，因此解决
消耗更少的时间公共决策者。
现货分区
在现行制度下，城市规划和区部分地区进行密集发展，其他
unintensive使用。它把相应的基础设施。其结果是，土地价格较低，
该地区定于unintensive使用。凡不密集（例如，多个家庭）的开发
去他的意外收获？他获得了土地。
因此，在现行制度下，计划决策邀请自己的毁灭。在一个意外的
wipeouts制度，但是，多开发商将不到奖励“突破”计划，
部分意外将抓回。因此，在暴利的wipeouts系统可能导致
更一致的计划的执行。
高风险方面的发展
在现行制度下，土地所有权和发展是一个高风险企业。正如我在作证
1974年丹尼斯O'Harrow纪念讲座：
大失败的风险巨大的暴利辩解收益。在一个社会愿意考虑公有制
和开发土地，因为一些建议，这是有点反常，很少考虑使用
转移支付修改收益和损失的方式[即]将使行业的发展
（和土地所有权）更近的做法相关的风险与公共或准公共设施。