This paper examines irrigation management

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/09/22 08:30:05
This paper examines irrigation management
conduct within the Japanese Water Users Association
(WUA), namely the Land Improvement District (LID).
LID is regarded as a successful case of participatory
irrigation management (PIM), in which there are few
conflicts over water between farmers so that it attains
high social cost performance. However, the management
system of LID still remains obscure. We throw light on
this system assuming the existence of “the rule of
fairness”. Farmers operate the irrigation facilities in a
self-serving way and have their own rule of fairness, such
as upstream superiority, based on the long-term experiences
of irrigation systems. We defined this rule of
fairness as made up of two components: one is “fairness
of outcome” and the other is “fairness of procedure”.
Finally, we discovered that the approach of LID staff is
the essential factor to satisfying the farmers’ criteria of

本文探讨灌溉管理

行为日本人用水者协会

（的WUA ） ，即土地改良区（症） 。

顶盖被看作是一个成功的情况下参与

灌溉管理（ PIM ） ，其中有一些

冲突与农民争水，使之达到

高昂的社会代价性能。然而，管理

系统的顶盖仍然是模糊的。我们揭示

假设这个系统的存在“的规则

公平“ 。农民经营的灌溉设施

自我服务的方式，并有自己的规则，公平，例如

作为上游优势的基础上，长期的经验

灌溉系统。我们这条规则的定义

公平由两部分组成：一个是“公平

结果“和”公平的程序“ 。

最后，我们发现，该方法的顶盖人员

的重要因素，满足了农民的标准

公平和维护和平;顶盖人员重视

对农民的习惯性规则，同时注意保持

中立的仲裁农民之间的争吵并试图

组织的透明度，以确保农民。这可

是一个很好的教训也为未来的PIM项目。