汉译英，要人工的。谢谢

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/09/22 16:55:41
文字如下：
不作为犯罪是相对于作为犯罪而言的，由于不作为犯罪的复杂性，其一直是刑法理论上争论的焦点。不作为犯又分为纯正不作为犯和不纯正不作为犯。就不纯正不作为犯而言，我国刑法没有像有的国家的刑法那样作出总则性的规定，这就使得不纯正不作为犯的司法认定问题倍感棘手。在实践中处罚不纯正不作为犯，事实上大多是站在“超法规”的立场，即从法律明确规定之外去寻找根据。因此，不纯正不作为犯的处罚与罪刑法定原则的关系自然成为敏感的问题。
本文以不纯正不作为犯与罪刑法定原则的冲突关系为研究对象，综合运用比较分析法、历史分析法和法解释学等方法，在对我国现有关于不纯正不作为犯的立法规定进行深入分析的基础上，吸收了德、日等国对于处罚不纯正不作为犯的立法规定和相关建议，重点探讨有关完善不纯正不作为犯的各种立法模式，并结合我国目前的刑法条文及制度，进而提出改进的建议。

Not as a crime is in relation to the purposes of a criminal, not as a crime because of the complex nature of its criminal law theory has always been a bone of contention. Omission is not further divided into pure and impure, as guilty of omission. Do not pure in terms of omission, not as China's Criminal Law in some countries as to general principles of criminal law provisions, making non-pure judicial omission that more difficult questions. Punishment in practice is not pure omission, in fact most are from the perspective of "super-law" position, that is clear from the legal provisions go beyond the search in accordance with. Therefore, there is no pure omission committed the crime and punishment and the principle of the relationship between statutory naturally become sensitive issues.
This paper is not pure omission committed the crime and the statutory principles and the relationship between conflict as the research object, the integrated use of comparative an