高手帮忙翻译下这段啊，麻烦了！

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/30 09:48:40
Yet multiple authorship—however good it may be in other ways—presents for journals and for the institutions in which these authors work.For the journals,long lists of authors are hard thing goes wrong with the paper.If there is research misconduct,should the liability be joint and several,accruing to all authors?If not,then how should it be allocated among them?If there is an honest mistake in one part of the work but not in others,how should an evaluator aim his or her review?

然而，多个作者，但是良好的可在其他方面，提出了期刊和机构在这些作者work.For的期刊，只要名单作者很难的事情错在哪里与研究paper.If有不当行为，应责任是连带，获得所有作者？如果没有，那么应如何分配呢？如果有一个诚实的错误，一个地区的工作，但不能在其他情况下，应该如何评估目的的他或她的审查？