请帮忙翻译成英语 O(∩_∩)O谢谢
来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/07/08 11:12:38
D drives a car negligently and damages X's car as a result.
X, the insured party, has Collision insurance, and claims (i.e., asks for payment) under his policy[1] against I-X, his insurer.
I-X pays in full to have X's car repaired.
I-X then sues D for negligence to recoup some or all of the sums paid out to X.
I-X receives the full amount of any amounts recovered in the action against D up to the amount to which I-X indemnified X. X retains none of the proceeds of the action against D except to the extent that they exceed the amount that I-X paid to X.
If X were paid in full by I-X and still had a claim in full against D, then X could recover "twice" for the same loss. The basis of the law of subrogation is that when I-X agrees to indemnify X against a certain loss, then X "shall be fully indemnified, but never more than fully indemnified ... if ever a proposition was brought forward which is at variance with it, that is to say, whic
X, the insured party, has Collision insurance, and claims (i.e., asks for payment) under his policy[1] against I-X, his insurer.
I-X pays in full to have X's car repaired.
I-X then sues D for negligence to recoup some or all of the sums paid out to X.
I-X receives the full amount of any amounts recovered in the action against D up to the amount to which I-X indemnified X. X retains none of the proceeds of the action against D except to the extent that they exceed the amount that I-X paid to X.
If X were paid in full by I-X and still had a claim in full against D, then X could recover "twice" for the same loss. The basis of the law of subrogation is that when I-X agrees to indemnify X against a certain loss, then X "shall be fully indemnified, but never more than fully indemnified ... if ever a proposition was brought forward which is at variance with it, that is to say, whic
D驱动汽车疏忽和损害X的车了。
十,被保险人一方,有碰撞保险和索赔(即要求付款)在他的政策[ 1 ]对九,他的保险。
一X支付全额有X的汽车修理。
九然后起诉D的疏忽收回部分或全部款项支付给十
第九条获得的全部数额的任何款项收回的行动,打击D最多为这九弥十X保留任何收益的行动,打击D除外,因为它们超出数额支付第九至第十
如果x是全额支付第九和仍然有充分的索赔对开发,则X可以收回“两次”对同一损失。根据该法的代位是,当九同意赔偿X针对某些损失,则X “应得到充分的赔偿,但从未超过充分弥...如果任何一个命题提出了这是不符合它,也就是说,这将防止[ X ]的获得充分的赔偿,或将[ x ]个以上完整的补偿,这一点必须肯定是错误的。 “ [ 2 ]