UC知道有谁能帮我翻译一下这段英文呢？谢啦！不要在线翻译的那种哦~~
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/27 16:15:32
Studies trying to assess the economy-wide consequences of anti-dumping (AD) typically …nd large, negative
welfare effects of AD legislation. One commonly cited example is the CGE modeling of Gallaway, Blonigen
and Flynn (1999), where it is estimated that the welfare loss caused by the AD tariffs that the USA had in
place in 1993 was of the order of $ 3.95 bn. On top of these welfare losses from AD tariffs, Vandenbussche
and Zanardi (2006) show how AD depresses trade flows beyond the 2-5% of world trade flows directly
affected by AD investigations or tariffs.
Keeping these results in mind, it is important to study what can be driving so many countries to adopt
AD legislation, and quite a few of them to use it intensively. Does political economy tell the whole story?
This paper shows theoretically that enforcing AD legislation may lead to welfare gains, concentrating on
indirect (i.e. non-tariff and non-investigation) effects of AD, accru
welfare effects of AD legislation. One commonly cited example is the CGE modeling of Gallaway, Blonigen
and Flynn (1999), where it is estimated that the welfare loss caused by the AD tariffs that the USA had in
place in 1993 was of the order of $ 3.95 bn. On top of these welfare losses from AD tariffs, Vandenbussche
and Zanardi (2006) show how AD depresses trade flows beyond the 2-5% of world trade flows directly
affected by AD investigations or tariffs.
Keeping these results in mind, it is important to study what can be driving so many countries to adopt
AD legislation, and quite a few of them to use it intensively. Does political economy tell the whole story?
This paper shows theoretically that enforcing AD legislation may lead to welfare gains, concentrating on
indirect (i.e. non-tariff and non-investigation) effects of AD, accru
研究试图评估经济的广泛影响的反倾销（AD）的典型...第二大，负
反倾销立法的福利的影响。一个普遍被引用的例子是Gallaway，Blonigen专家咨询小组建模
和Flynn（1999年），其中估计的福利损失由该广告的关税，美国曾造成
在1993年举行的是3.95美元亿秩序。论从公元关税，范登布舍这些福利损失顶部
和扎纳尔迪（2006）将展示如何公元抑制超出了2-5％，世界贸易流动的直接贸易流量
受反倾销调查或关税。
铭记这些结果，重要的是要研究如何能驾驶如此多的国家采取
反倾销立法，也有其中一些也大量使用。是否政治经济学告诉整个故事？
本文从理论上证明，实行反倾销立法可能导致福利的增加，集中在
间接的（即非关税和非调查）的广告效果，累积从...均方根遵守与广告
立法（学习行为的范登布舍和扎纳尔迪（2006））语言。