UC知道请高手翻译~~谢谢！！
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/07/05 06:15:43
这个好难啊~高手出手阿！谢谢！
The neo-realist-neo-liberal institutionalism debate develops along a number of criticisms, primary among which is the realist or neo-realist assertion that international institutions play a minimal role in shaping international politics and that the prospects for cooperation in anarchy are bleak. Although they have similarity in international anarchy, the actors in international politics, international order and international institutions, they have great differences in their explanations on the essence of international systems, institutional styles, and formation and function of international Neo-liberal institutionalism questions these claims, challenging the logical coherence of the neo-realist argument and arguing that the explanatory power of neo-realism is weak because it fails to move beyond an emphasis on the primacy of states as key actors in international relations. In this article, I will discuss the existence and significance differences between n
The neo-realist-neo-liberal institutionalism debate develops along a number of criticisms, primary among which is the realist or neo-realist assertion that international institutions play a minimal role in shaping international politics and that the prospects for cooperation in anarchy are bleak. Although they have similarity in international anarchy, the actors in international politics, international order and international institutions, they have great differences in their explanations on the essence of international systems, institutional styles, and formation and function of international Neo-liberal institutionalism questions these claims, challenging the logical coherence of the neo-realist argument and arguing that the explanatory power of neo-realism is weak because it fails to move beyond an emphasis on the primacy of states as key actors in international relations. In this article, I will discuss the existence and significance differences between n
在新现实主义，新自由制度主义的辩论的发展是一些批评，其中主要是现实主义或新现实主义的主张，即国际机构在塑造国际政治中的作用不大，而且在无政府状态合作的前景十分暗淡。虽然他们在国际无政府状态的相似性，在国际政治，国际秩序和国际机构的行动者，他们在对国际制度，体制风格本质的解释，很大分歧，形成和国际新功能，自由制度问题，这些索赔，挑战性的新的逻辑连贯性，现实主义论点，并辩称，解释力的新现实主义是脆弱，因为它不能超越了关于国家在国际关系中的主要行动者的首要地位的重视。在这篇文章中，我将讨论的存在和意义之间的分歧，新自由制度
你可以找雅虎翻译试一试