UC知道谁能帮我翻译下谢谢哦
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/07/04 11:13:17
Yet it does not suffice to refute elementary fallacies. Sophisticated alarmists avoid them (taking care, obviously, not to educate their listeners). Put carefully, their case goes as follows. The breadth and intensity of third-world competition is increasing. The pressure is concentrated on particular parts of the economy—for the moment, on low –skill manufacturing. Wages there are being forced down and jobs lost. This change will accelerate. Modem societies (with weak ties of family and religion) are no longer equipped to withstand such strains. The result will be great social distress.
This argument rests on a series of claims that need to be examined one by one. One survey does this at length. It aggress that in many industries the developing countries are offering much stiffer competition than before, and that this will continue. It also agrees that the wages and jobs of low-skilled workers are under pressure as a result. But it argues, first, that these effects have been ove
This argument rests on a series of claims that need to be examined one by one. One survey does this at length. It aggress that in many industries the developing countries are offering much stiffer competition than before, and that this will continue. It also agrees that the wages and jobs of low-skilled workers are under pressure as a result. But it argues, first, that these effects have been ove
它不足够了反驳基本的谬论。 老练轻事重报者避免他们(保重，明显地，不教育他们的听众)。 投入仔细地，他们的情况如下去。 广度和强度三世界竞争增加。 压力被集中特殊部分的经济为片刻，在低落-技巧制造业。 那里薪水被强迫下来和失去的工作。 这变动将加速。 调制解调器社会(与家庭和宗教微弱的领带)不再被装备承受这样张力。 结果将是伟大的社会困厄。 这个论据基于需要逐个被审查的一系列的要求。 一次勘测充分做此。 它在许多产业发展中国家提供更加激烈的竞争的aggress比前面，并且这将继续。 它也同意结果低熟练的工作者薪水和工作是在压力下。 但它争论，第一，这些作用过分了。 三世界收入由在生产力上的国际区别自动地调控; 穷国在提高他们的生产力在廉价劳力越快速地成功，快速他们的好处将被腐蚀。 而且，那好处本身被夸大了。 人工成本是总成本的仅一个小部分，特别是在制造业; 在其他方面-在补全物理和人力资本-穷国将保持在大缺点多年来。 如此压力被夸张了。 另一方面，什么工业国站立获取形式更加快速的成长在第三世界一共被忽略了。 更强的竞争将推挤富有国家生产商投资更多和改进他们的充分; 扩展市场为富有国家出口将给他们收割新的经济尺度。 更加重要的是更加伟大的生产力在第三世界在北部生活水平将有的直接效应。 更加便宜的进口意味低价，并且，因此，更高的实际收入。 潜在的获取是大