UC知道会计问题，英译中
来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/09/24 18:19:38
The good news is that some expenses were correctly classified under COS (Cognos and monthly executive report) since 1 Jan 07, and thus, no re-classification is necessary. For the local books, I think some further adjustments on account classification are still necessary (to review after completion of the exercise mentioned in point 7 below).
The only thing I did wrong is the presentation materials. During the quarterly review for 1Q07, I analyzed the variance of total operating expenses (COS+SG&A) as I did not have enough time to uplift the impact of re-allocation of certain stockyard operating expenses from SG&A to COS from Jan 07 onwards. This time, I analyze COS and SG&A separately, but unfortunately, I fail to take away the irrelevant explanations for variance in SG&A
In fact, the bridge analysis for SG&A contained in the presentation materials has already highlighted the major increasing SG&A items, and you can see that it is nothing to do with expenses on inte
The only thing I did wrong is the presentation materials. During the quarterly review for 1Q07, I analyzed the variance of total operating expenses (COS+SG&A) as I did not have enough time to uplift the impact of re-allocation of certain stockyard operating expenses from SG&A to COS from Jan 07 onwards. This time, I analyze COS and SG&A separately, but unfortunately, I fail to take away the irrelevant explanations for variance in SG&A
In fact, the bridge analysis for SG&A contained in the presentation materials has already highlighted the major increasing SG&A items, and you can see that it is nothing to do with expenses on inte
好消息是, 一些费用正确地被分(Cognos 和月度行政报告) 从1月1 日07 日, 和因而, 重新分类不是必要的。为地方书, 我进一步认为一些调整在帐户分类是必要的(回顾在锻炼的完成以后下面被提及在点7) 。 我冤屈的唯一的事是介绍材料。在季度回顾期间为1Q07, 我分析了总营业费用的变化(COS SG