帮忙翻译，谢谢，分分送上。

来源：百度知道 编辑：UC知道 时间：2024/06/28 10:06:37
Providing More Ports in Less Space. Nortel Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 switch, compared to Cisco Catalyst 3750G switch, provides 1.8 times more ports in 41 percent less space.
Switch fabric capacity: The Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 has a five times faster switch fabric than Cisco Catalyst 3750G (160 Gbps vs. 32 Gbps). Nortel greater capacity means that performance will not be hindered as requirements demand more switching capability.
Stacking throughput: For a single switch, the Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 has 2.5 times greater stacking bandwidth than Cisco Catalyst 3750G (80 Gbps vs. 32 Gbps).
For a full stack, the Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 has 20 times greater stacking capability than Cisco Catalyst 3750G (640 Gbps vs. 32 Gbps). The Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 uses point-to-point traffic flow, whereas Cisco Catalyst 3750G uses dual rings. In case of failure, Cisco Catalyst 3750G’s stacking throughput drops by 50%. With the Ethernet Routing Switch 5510, the throu

Providing More Ports in Less Space. Nortel Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 switch, compared to Cisco Catalyst 3750G switch, provides 1.8 times more ports in 41 percent less space.
Switch fabric capacity: The Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 has a five times faster switch fabric than Cisco Catalyst 3750G (160 Gbps vs. 32 Gbps). Nortel greater capacity means that performance will not be hindered as requirements demand more switching capability.
Stacking throughput: For a single switch, the Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 has 2.5 times greater stacking bandwidth than Cisco Catalyst 3750G (80 Gbps vs. 32 Gbps).
For a full stack, the Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 has 20 times greater stacking capability than Cisco Catalyst 3750G (640 Gbps vs. 32 Gbps). The Ethernet Routing Switch 5510 uses point-to-point traffic flow, whereas Cisco Catalyst 3750G uses dual rings. In case of failure, Cisco Catalyst 3750G’s stacking throughput drops by 50%. With the Ethernet Routing Switch 5510, the