翻译一段英文,清高手侃侃

来源:百度知道 编辑:UC知道 时间:2024/06/27 22:10:59
I suppose there is one central question to be dealt with, and I am not at all sure how to deal with it, although I am quite certain about my own answer to it. It is this: are there some kinds of information leading to some sorts of knowledge that human beings are really better off not having? Is there a limit to scientific inquiry not set by what is knowable but by what we ought to be knowing? Should we stop short of learning about some things, for fear of what we, or someone, will do with the knowledge? My own answer is a flat no, but I must confess that this is an intuitive response and I am neither inclined nor trained to reason my way through it.
There has been some effort, in and out of scientific quarters, to make recombinant-DNA into the issue on which to settle this argument. Proponents of this line of research are accused of pure hubris, of assuming the rights of gods, of arrogance and outrage; what is more, they confess themselves to be in the business of making five hy

我有一个核心问题必须解决,我不敢肯定该如何处理,虽然我很肯定自己的答案.这是因为:有几种类型的一些重要线索,人类的知识实在不富裕?是不是有一个限度确定什么是科学探究可知而是我们应当知道?要制止某些事物缺乏了解,怕什么,我们或是别人,会做的知识?我的答案是没有一个单位、但我必须承认,这是一种直觉反应,我不是因为我的训练方式也倾向于通过.已有一些努力,并进行科学的宿舍、使重组DNA进入问题,解决这个论点.倡议这项研究被指控纯系傲慢,以为神权、傲慢与愤怒; 何况他们承认自己是在制造商五杂种自己的手.剑桥市市长和纽约总检察长都尽量杜绝,随即进行.这是不太一样的说法,不过,由于其中约有限制知识虽然这是必然的一部分.知识已经来临,流行的说法是对的应用技术.应该作一些有益的DNA或蛋白质有趣纳入大肠杆菌质粒与否?有一种错误的危险插入毒素或危险的病毒,然后经杂交新生物体扩散到实验室?这是一个技术创造新品种的病原体,因为这应该加以制止吗?

太长了哦

用翻译软件去翻译吧